Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Marcia writes: ‘My husband said he offered to take the kids to the footy, but they were “disinterested.” Surely, he should have said “uninterested.” What is your ruling on this?’
For many years I have been insisting that ‘disinterested’ means impartial, unbiased—in the way that a judge is impartial at a trial, having no vested interest in either party, keeping himself quite neutral.
That, I have been saying, is what ‘disinterested’ really means.
To say there is a lack of interest what you should say is ‘uninterested.’
That is the argument that I have been putting up for years.
And the vast majority of educated people have agreed with me on this.
But there is now a fly in that ointment.
I have now learned that when ‘disinterested’ came into English in the 1600s it meant BOTH of those things—both ‘impartial and unbiased’ and also ‘uninterested, unconcerned.’
Over the centuries this distinction gradually eroded, and the word came to have only one meaning—the meaning that I have been defending for years.
But in the 20th century the ‘uninterested’ meaning has been revived.
Educated people still maintain that it is wrong—but given the history of the word, do we need now need to allow this?
The Chambers Dictionary people have written this up in their delightful little book Terms to Make You Squirm.
In their entry on ‘disinterest’ they tell the story that I have just told you.
The conclusion they come to is that you are still better to stick to ‘uninterested’ for a lack of interest and ‘disinterested’ for impartial—simply because it’s what literate people now expect.
But that seems to clash with the history of the word.
So, now over you.
What is your ruling? Have I got to stop insisting on restricting ‘disinterested’ to mean impartial?
Do I have to allow that it sometimes means ‘uninterested’?
You are the jury.
What is your ruling?
There's a brand-new episode of the podcast 'Words with Kel Richards' now available (free of charge) -- with the dateline 26 March 2026. You can find it by scrolling further down this home page -- or from wherever you usually get your podcasts.
TO SIGN UP FOR THE FREE DAILY NEWSLETTER SCROLL FURTHER DOWN THIS PAGE >>>>>>
The latest issue of Australian Geographic is now at newsagents -- with a big beaked kookaburra on the front cover, and inside my two small columns on 'Ozwords' and 'Placenames.'
BOOKS:
* My latest book is Sherlock Holmes: 5-Minute Mysteries -- containing 50 new stories I have written about the great detective. You can find it on Amazon. Just go to Amazon and type in Sherlock Holmes: 5-Minute Mysteries in the search panel. Or use this link: h Amazon.com.au : Sherlock Holmes 5-Minute Mysteries Kel Richards
* My book "Defending the Gospel" is now in a second, fully revised, edition. You can find it here: Defending the Gospel – matthiasmedia.com.au
* If you're looking for my recent book "Flash Jim" you'll find it here -- Flash Jim, The astonis
* You can find all Kel's books currently in print here -- Booktopia Search Results for 'kel richards'. We sell books, hardback, paperback, audio, CDs.
* And also here -- Amazon.com.au : Kel Richards
* And you'll find more here -- Search: 4 results found for "Kel Richards" – matthiasmedia.com.au
* Many of Kel's out of print books can be found at ABE Books -- Kel Richards - AbeBooks explaining words explain the term
BY THE WAY...
If you'd like to see my A-Z list of Aussie slang, you'll find it here in the Australian Geographic website -- A-Z list of Aussie slang. Here’s the link: The A-Z of Aussie slang - Australian Geographic
The liveliest part of this website is usually the Q and A page -- be sure to check it out from time to time.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.